ed note--and, once again ladies and Gentile-men, reminding what should not need reminding to those who claim to be J-wise.
The author of this piece, Max Boot--
--is one of the most important gears making up the NeoCon machinery in America and elsewhere. His job as an Israeli intelligence asset is to fill American airwaves and thus American brainwaves with ideas, themes, thoughts, concepts etc in such a way that US foreign policy works for Israel's interest, the most important of which is WAR.
He--along with fellow 'team members' David Frum, William Kristol, the portly Kagan brothers, Jennifer Rubin, Eliot Cohen et al, represent the multi-headed hydra in America responsible for keeping the 'war on terror' on track so that Israel is not backed into a corner where she is forced to pull off ANOTHER 911 style event in order to get the war fever started anew.
Boot--along with his aforementioned 'team members', are also united in their VERY vocal opposition to Trump, first as a candidate and now as POTUS and are united in their mission--as much as they were united in driving America to war in the aftermath of 9/11--in seeing Trump removed, and for exactly the same reasons--keeping America embroiled in Israel's wars against which Trump is opposed 100%.
That these basic, rudimentary, and elementary facts need more than 3 seconds' worth of explanation to a group of people who pride themselves on being 'wise' to the ways of Judea speaks volumes about just how much a day late and a dollar short such a 'movement' really is as well as why it is that those of the non-Gentile persuasion entertain the kinds of derogatory opinions that they do vis the intellectual capacity of their non-Judaic counterparts.
The author of this piece, Max Boot--
--is one of the most important gears making up the NeoCon machinery in America and elsewhere. His job as an Israeli intelligence asset is to fill American airwaves and thus American brainwaves with ideas, themes, thoughts, concepts etc in such a way that US foreign policy works for Israel's interest, the most important of which is WAR.
He--along with fellow 'team members' David Frum, William Kristol, the portly Kagan brothers, Jennifer Rubin, Eliot Cohen et al, represent the multi-headed hydra in America responsible for keeping the 'war on terror' on track so that Israel is not backed into a corner where she is forced to pull off ANOTHER 911 style event in order to get the war fever started anew.
Boot--along with his aforementioned 'team members', are also united in their VERY vocal opposition to Trump, first as a candidate and now as POTUS and are united in their mission--as much as they were united in driving America to war in the aftermath of 9/11--in seeing Trump removed, and for exactly the same reasons--keeping America embroiled in Israel's wars against which Trump is opposed 100%.
That these basic, rudimentary, and elementary facts need more than 3 seconds' worth of explanation to a group of people who pride themselves on being 'wise' to the ways of Judea speaks volumes about just how much a day late and a dollar short such a 'movement' really is as well as why it is that those of the non-Gentile persuasion entertain the kinds of derogatory opinions that they do vis the intellectual capacity of their non-Judaic counterparts.
Max Boot
The French philosopher Montesquieu wrote in 1748: “The tyranny of a prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy.” We are seeing his warning vindicated. President Trump is increasingly acting as a tyrannical (and erratic) prince. And yet much of the public is so inured to his misconduct that his latest assaults on the rule of law are met with a collective shrug. Public passivity is Trump’s secret weapon as he pursues his authoritarian agenda. “I have the right to do whatever I want,” he says, and the lack of pushback seems to confirm it.
So much bad has happened since Trump was unjustly acquitted by the Senate of two articles of impeachment on Feb. 5 that it’s hard to keep it all straight.
Trump fired Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland and Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman for complying with a congressional subpoena and providing truthful testimony about Trump’s attempts to extort Ukraine into aiding him politically. Also ousted was Vindman’s brother, who did not testify. This sends a mob-like message: If you turn stool pigeon, your family gets it, too.
Trump’s ongoing quest for retribution has also claimed Jessie K. Liu, who was abruptly removed as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia and replaced by a close aide to Attorney General William P. Barr after prosecuting Trump loyalists, including Michael Flynn and Roger Stone. Now Liu’s nomination to a senior Treasury Department position has been withdrawn. Next on the chopping block may be Elaine McCusker, the Pentagon official who tried to tell the Office of Management and Budget that Trump had no right to withhold aid to Ukraine. The New York Post reported that her nomination to be Pentagon comptroller will be withdrawn. (McCusker denies the report.)
While punishing those who dared to tell the truth, Trump is protecting those who assist his coverup. He inveighed against the request of federal prosecutors, following normal sentencing guidelines, to give Stone a seven- to nine-year prison sentence for witness tampering and lying to Congress. Trump also attacked the judge overseeing Stone’s case and the forewoman of the jury that convicted him. The Justice Department then asked for a reduced sentence. Four prosecutors resigned from the case in protest, and one quit the Justice Department.
Even Barr was driven to denounce Trump’s public interference in the legal system, saying that the president’s tweets “make it impossible for me to do my job and to assure the courts and the prosecutors and the department that we’re doing our work with integrity.” In response, Trump asserted that he has the “legal right” to determine who gets prosecuted — technically true but hardly in keeping with American tradition.
Barr’s protests ring hollow given how eager he has been to subvert his own department on Trump’s behalf — for example, by mischaracterizing the findings of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. Barr has appointed one prosecutor to review Flynn’s conviction and another to investigate the FBI and CIA personnel who uncovered the Russian plot to elect Trump in 2016. The New York Times reports that the latter prosecutor, John H. Durham, has raised alarm in the intelligence community by appearing to pursue a theory, popular among right-wing conspiracy mongers, “that the C.I.A., under its former director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result.”
Anxiety about attempts to politicize justice will only grow because of a Post report that Trump was furious that the Justice Department did not file charges against former FBI director James B. Comey and former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe — even though there is no evidence that either of these men broke any laws. After learning that his enemies were not being indicted, The Post reports, “Trump has become more insistent that Durham finish his work soon,” because he “wants to be able to use whatever Durham finds as a cudgel in his reelection campaign.”
As Justice Department veteran David Laufman writes, “We are now truly at a break-glass-in-case-of-fire moment for the Justice Dept.” But does anyone give a damn? Democratic lawmakers are, to be sure, perturbed, but it’s easy (if unfair) to write off their outrage as mere partisanship. Republican members of Congress, as usual, either have nothing to say or offer ineffectual expressions of “concern.”
And the public? I don’t see massive marches in the streets. I don’t see people flooding their members of Congress with calls and emails. I don’t see the outrage that is warranted — and necessary. I see passivity, resignation and acquiescence from a distracted electorate that has come to accept Trump’s aberrant behavior as the norm.
A recent Gallup poll found that Trump’s approval rating among Republicans — the supposed law-and-order party — is at a record-high 94 percent. His support in the country as a whole is only 43.4 percent in the FiveThirtyEight average, but he is still well positioned to win reelection, because most people seem to care a lot more about the strength of the stock market than about the strength of our democracy. This is how democracies die — not in darkness but in full view of a public that couldn’t care less.
